🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an celebration that began as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass events where individuals of African heritage are paid to address Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The surge has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since those days, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the observance is observed is a indication of the current political situation. How it evolves is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels emboldened to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the European continent as a whole.

In the United States, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A effort to erase African American heritage and narrative from the records is in progress. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the celebration illustrates how minimally it can be impactful if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the conditions of the current era. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. An academic expert, a educator at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month completely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an time that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an framework that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out through the year (as some institutions are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not evade political issues, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is mere awareness of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the street? Institutions who mark it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and alertness to subtle slights, but confronted with the threats that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and responsive. Perhaps an complete renaming is required – Contemporary Black History Month.